








8.8| Average votes grouped by age and by sex: | |||||||
| Age: | 1-12 | 13-17 | 18-25 | 26-35 | 36-49 | 50+ | Total |
| Men: Votes: |
- 0 |
- 0 |
- 0 |
10 1 |
- 0 |
- 0 |
10 1 |
| Women: Votes: |
- 0 |
- 0 |
- 0 |
- 0 |
7 1 |
- 0 |
7 1 |
| Total: Votes: |
- 0 |
- 0 |
- 0 |
10 2 |
8 2 |
- 0 |
8.8 5 |
| Total includes those who didn't specify sex. | |||||||
I have seen nearly all Woody's films because my husband and I are fans of his. This film is an account of a obscure jazz musician (probably because of his worthless behaviour towards women and his obsession with the bottle) and his quirky fascination for trains and his boorish treatment of his mute love interest. He is a loser as a husband and a star when playing his guitar. It is a masterpiece for its portrayal of the early 20th century look and feel and the signature style of personal interviews. I feel little for this man because of his lack of humanity. So, it isn't any wonder that he was forgotten. Who could hold this person up and marvel about what he could accomplish with the instrument when he couldn't treat anyone around him with respect. This film reminds me of Anthony Quinn's treatment of his assistant in La Strada. Blind devotion begets misery. Woody has made another quirky and funny docu-drama. Who is really the winner?
| 7/10 | girard@ - first review 3.9.2002 - age: 36-49 |
Incredible. Sean Penn, masterpiece. Woody Allen, his usual best.
| 10/10 | eddieschwartz@ - 29 reviews 28.2.2001 - age: 26-35 |
I really liked this movie. That's why I'm giving it a 10. Woody Allen is funny and Sean Penn is funny. Sometimes I am funny.
| 10/10 | hcnguy@ - 24 reviews 14.2.2000 - age: 26-35 |
Note: User reviews posted on this page are personal opinions of our readers. We are not responsible for their content.