Log in / Sign up
Believe it or not it was pretty terrible and worse than the first one. Age of Ultron is another in a line of generic Marvel movies that pull revenue because they have superheroes in them. The action sequences were extremely blurry and shaky making it impossible to really pay attention, there was a lot of forced humour, and not much originality, mind control again? Seen it before. The different segments of the movie are meandering and loose and you find yourself not really caring about the outcome. The climax is badly directed and the ideology that they are trying so hard to work into the movie about freedom and peace is not even close to being developed enough. Go see Kingsman instead it's a much better film and you'll feel like you got your money's worth.
There is a problem with your e-mail address and we are unable to communicate with you. Please go to My Account to update your email.
Please choose a username to sign your comments. Only letters, digits, dash - or period. Minimum 4 characters.
Your age and sex:
We publish all comments, except abusive, at our discretion.
A 1? You shouldn't be watching films. You need to be creating them so that you'll be satisfied. In no way, shape, or form is this a terrible movie by any means. Everyone is entitled to an opinion, however, don't butcher something that isn't warranted. I loved Kingsman but it wasn't better than Ultron... not by a mile.
The movie deserved a 1 due to the fact that it was a counterbalance to all the people by reflex giving it a 10. There were no actual funny moments in the film and flashing visuals and millions of dollars of blurry visuals do not make for a good movie Imho. Agree to disagree.
Yet you gave Battle of Five Armies an 8... so odd! And I guess you didn't laugh during the party seen ( guess you were alone then ) might not be the best, but doesn't deserve a 1. However I do agree that Kingsman was great!