Log in / Sign up
 
    Share this page

    Dracula 2000

    Advertisement

    Reviewed by
    dukeforrest@

    It's not as bad as it could have been, but it was a sleazy marketing ploy to attach Wes Craven's name to it when he didn't even sit in the director's chair. But at least Craven could have casted the movie! I can think of hundreds of actors who could play Dracula better. Christopher Lee, Gary Oldman, Gary Coleman for that matter! Even Carl Anderson could have played the role better! Geraard Butler's Drac disappoints.

    5
    HelpfulNot helpful  Reply
    dukeforrest@  3.1.2001 age: 13-17 8 reviews

    Show all reviews for this movie
    Note: The movie review posted on this page reflects a personal opinion of one user. We are not responsible for its content.

    Did you see ''Dracula 2000''?

    There is a problem with your e-mail address and we are unable to communicate with you. Please go to My Account to update your email.

    How do you rate this movie?

    Select stars from 1 to 10.
    10 - A masterpiece, go, see it now
    9 - Excellent movie, a must see
    8 - Great movie, don't miss it
    7 - Good movie, worth seeing
    6 - Not bad, could be much better
    5 - So so, okay if you don't pay
    4 - Not good, even if you don't pay
    3 - Poor movie, not recommended
    2 - Very bad, forget about it
    1 - Worst ever, avoid at all costs

    Please explain. Write your comment here:

    Please choose a username to sign your comments. Only letters, digits, dash - or period. Minimum 4 characters.

    Your age and sex:

    We publish all comments, except abusive, at our discretion.